Speed cameras: coming to a police state near you!

Anything not related to the AE86 and cars in general (but let's keep it respectful and courteous everyone).

Moderators: dr.occa, CBR_TOY


User avatar
JDMwhiteboy
VIP Member
Posts: 1534
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:38 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Speed cameras: coming to a police state near you!

Post by JDMwhiteboy »

THANK YOU TEXAS!!!!!!!!!!
I like cars, food, and puppies.

User avatar
16vHachi
Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:24 am
Location: Abilene, Texas
Contact:

Re: Speed cameras: coming to a police state near you!

Post by 16vHachi »

I love TEXAS!!!
Image
1984 Toyota Corolla- Drift Project
"Those aren't mudflaps!! They are mullets for tires!"
"Yall Doin That Skid Racin Again?"
Stay Sideways My Friends!

User avatar
GamblerZ
Member
Posts: 495
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 2:15 pm
Location: West Texas
Contact:

Re: Speed cameras: coming to a police state near you!

Post by GamblerZ »

I believe Texas law mandates that an officer has to observe you breaking the law (ie. speeding, etc.).
'85 Toyota Corolla GT-S Hatchback DMG
'92 Lexus SC400 Diamond White Pearl (WTS/WTT)
'99 Lexus SC300 Millenium Silver Metallic (WTS)

User avatar
16vHachi
Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:24 am
Location: Abilene, Texas
Contact:

Re: Speed cameras: coming to a police state near you!

Post by 16vHachi »

i believe youre right, its gotta be whitnessed by an officer
Image
1984 Toyota Corolla- Drift Project
"Those aren't mudflaps!! They are mullets for tires!"
"Yall Doin That Skid Racin Again?"
Stay Sideways My Friends!

dr.occa
Hades - Site Admin
Posts: 7734
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:49 pm
Location: On my hiney...in HOU
Contact:

Re: Speed cameras: coming to a police state near you!

Post by dr.occa »

GamblerZ wrote:I believe Texas law mandates that an officer has to observe you breaking the law (ie. speeding, etc.).
IF that is true I don't see how Houston was able to implement red light intersection cameras in light of that mandate. The city of Houston just voted them out this past November in spite of their opposition-less installment. Supposedly the camera manufacturers sued the city to keep from breaking contract and the cameras are still up but not on. SUPPOSEDLY. Either way, how does keeping inactive cameras in place keep the city of Houston within any service agreement if the units requiring service aren't even actively being used? I can break from AT&T at any time and just pay an early termination fee. The only way I could be kept from breaking away from the contract is if I did not intend to pay the cancellation fee. No one can keep me bound to any contract outside of that unless within the stipulations. Seriously, it doesn't sound quite right.

Post Reply